New York Times’ Caroline Hopkins and scientists interviewed for the story “Do I Need to Worry About Smartphone Radiation?” should be embarrassed

Presenting a complex scientific problem in a news media story is a difficult task. On the one hand, the presented science should be accurate but, on the other hand, it should be understood by an average reader, a layperson.   … Continue reading →

The (unmentioned) Risk of Bias (RoB) of the Systematic Review on RF-EMF and Cancer

Correction: this sentence was incorrect and is removed with my sincere apology: “This systematic review is a part of the ongoing WHO review of the science of RF-EMF and health.” Yesterday, been has published a systematic review ‘In vivo Studies … Continue reading →

Coming soon: Australian Podcast interview with Prof Dariusz Leszczynski

This gallery contains 2 photos.

It is coming in the first week of February…(February 1, 2023 at 10AM Brisbane time) It is a long interview (1.5 hours total recorded on October 18, 2022) on wireless radiation, health, safety guidelines, and precautions. In this rather long … Continue reading →

Leszczynski presented at the ERRS 2022 in Catania

This gallery contains 1 photo.

As I have informed earlier, I was an Invited Speaker at the 47th Annual Meeting of the European Radiation Research Society (ERRS 2022), was held September 21st – 24th, 2022 in Catania (Italy) at the “Monastero dei Benedettini”. Here are … Continue reading →

Another take on relationships of journalist and scientist

The post below I have written in 2011, just after I returned from the IARC 2011 classification of RF as possible carcinogen (2B). Now, dealing with hidden censorship I remembered this post and… after reading I still consider it valid, … Continue reading →

Victor Leach of ORSAA: Critical review of the FDA 2020 Report

This gallery contains 2 photos.

Below is the next in a series of Guest Blogs on BRHP. The opinions expressed in this Guest Blog are of Victor Leach himself. Publication of these opinions in BRHP does not imply that BRHP automatically agrees with or endorses these … Continue reading →

New ICNIRP Guidelines… nothing really new… just the same stonewalling…

This gallery contains 2 photos.

New ICNIRP Guidelines will be published, any moment now, in the Health Physics journal. However, for already several months it is known what these new ICNIRP Guidelines will be… Interestingly and importantly, ICNIRP dismisses completely: existence and significance of non-thermal … Continue reading →