The (unmentioned) Risk of Bias (RoB) of the Systematic Review on RF-EMF and Cancer

Correction: this sentence was incorrect and is removed with my sincere apology: “This systematic review is a part of the ongoing WHO review of the science of RF-EMF and health.” Yesterday, been has published a systematic review ‘In vivo Studies … Continue reading →

Review of 5G mm-waves’ effects on skin, by D. Leszczynski, is in press in the Reviews on Environmental Health

This gallery contains 1 photo.

In November 2019, during my lecture tour in New Zealand (Auckland, Hawke’s Bay, Wellington & Nelson) I have briefly presented the very limited scientific evidence on the possible effects of millimeter-waves of the 5G on skin and skin cells. Recently, … Continue reading →

Leszczynski: Ramazzini study shows that cell tower radiation does not increase risk for Schwannoma and glioma

This gallery contains 7 photos.

On March 22, 2018, journal ‘Environmental Research‘ published a peer-reviewed article: “Report of final results regarding brain and heart tumors in Sprague-Dawley rats exposed from prenatal life until natural death to mobile phone radiofrequency field representative of a 1.8 GHz GSM … Continue reading →

Where science and big money collide…

Where science and big money collide, we enter a strange “twilight zone” of science politics, where various methods are applied to neutralize “inconvenient” science. One of the examples of such collision between science and big money is presented in, as … Continue reading →

WHO Environmental Health Criteria: A brief update

At the BioEM2016, I had a brief discussion with Eric van Rongen, about the status of the Environmental Health Criteria (EHC). This is what I learned: Task Group to evaluate science: recruitment is ongoing. The group will consist of some … Continue reading →

False claims of the study published in PLoS ONE – immediate retraction is needed

On January 13, 2016, was published in the journal PLoS ONE an article “Anthropogenic Radio-Frequency Electromagnetic Fields Elicit Neuropathic Pain in an Amputation Model” by Bryan Black, Rafael Granja-Vazquez, Benjamin R. Johnston, Erick Jones, and Mario Romero-Ortega. Claims made by … Continue reading →

‘Danish Cohort’ and the unwillingness of the Editors of the BMJ to act responsibly

This gallery contains 1 photo.

Reading the commentary in the British ‘Nature‘: “A tragedy of errors: Mistakes in peer-reviewed papers are easy to find but hard to fix” by David B. Allison, Andrew W. Brown, Brandon J. George, and Kathryn A. Kaiser, reminded me of … Continue reading →