IMPORTANT OPPORTUNITY: Experts’ Opinions in Radiation and Health (including 5G)

This gallery contains 1 photo.

Journal Frontiers in Public Health, specialty of ‘Radiation and Health‘ has just announced new Research Topic dealing with radiation emitted by wireless communication devices and networks, including the 5G, that will be published in 2022. It will consist solely of … Continue reading →

Brief Report from BioEM 2021 in Ghent

This gallery contains 17 photos.

Report from the BioEM 2021 Ghent, Belgium, September 26 – 30. 2021 Dariusz Leszczynski (opinions presented in this report are solely of the author) Few topics out of many… 5G now and in the future ICNIRP and IEEE-ICES safety limits … Continue reading →

Spanish translation of my BRHP blog published on March 22, 2021

My blog: Overwhelming power of ICNIRP opinions through backing from GSMA, MWF & telecoms: WHO and governmental agencies, like ARPANSA, BfS, TNO, STUK et al., meekly follow and disseminate misinformation on 5G millimeter-waves’ safety research …is now available in Spanish: … Continue reading →

Overwhelming power of ICNIRP opinions through backing from GSMA, MWF & telecoms: WHO and governmental agencies, like ARPANSA, BfS, TNO, STUK et al., meekly follow and disseminate misinformation on 5G millimeter-waves’ safety research

This gallery contains 1 photo.

In 2020, ICNIRP has published an updated safety guidelines for EMF exposures that consider solely thermal effects of radiation exposure as the source of any health effects. In ICNIRP’s opinion, prevention of thermal effects, by the currently used safety limits, … Continue reading →

ARPANSA’s unfounded claims on 5G safety – Nature Publisher should be embarrassed and retract!

This gallery contains 1 photo.

…This blog is first, about something funny, but then comes something not funny at all. Bear with me till the end… Few days ago two review articles on 5G millimeter-waves were published by scientists from Australia. The articles in question … Continue reading →

This is Big News from USA: Yet another expert considers RF as probably carcinogenic

I have written, on several occasions, about the differences between ICNIRP opinions and opinions of ICNIRP members when placed in non-ICNIRP scientific committees. There is something wrong with ICNIRP, that operates in detachment from science in general and thrives thanks … Continue reading →

Clear indication that ICNIRP review of science is skewed and should be independently validated

In this blog, published from 2009, first on website of STUK – Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority and subsequently transferred to the current site, I have criticized ICNIRP on many occasions. In my recently published blogs I have pointed out … Continue reading →