This gallery contains 2 photos.
Over the recent years, there were numerous complaints about the reliance of the WHO EMF Project solely on the opinions of the ICNIRP. In fact, the WHO EMF Project could be considered as “front” for the opinions of ICNIRP. It … Continue reading
This gallery contains 1 photo.
Correction added in response to the comment from Eric van Rongen. See at the bottom… Mona Nilsson pointed out that Eric van Rongen has not published original research on EMF. Indeed, the objective fact is that the majority of Eric … Continue reading
On March 30, 2018, I published a blog “Aftermath of the peer-review of the NTP study: Do not hold your breath…” In this blog post I wrote: “When group of experts is assembled and the experts’ careers do not depend, in … Continue reading
This gallery contains 1 photo.
…updated on April 3rd, 2018… It happened again – a big surprise. Scientists decided that NTP study shows effects in rats. When group of experts is assembled and the experts’ careers do not depend, in either direct or indirect way, … Continue reading
This gallery contains 1 photo.
On Dec. 7th, 2017, International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP), has published a ‘Note on the Revision of the High-Frequency Portion of the ICNIRP 1998 EMF Guidelines’. Revision of the guidelines has been long awaited because the current guidelines … Continue reading
This gallery contains 1 photo.
On October 14th, 2017, Finnish newspaper ‘Helsingin sanomat’, in its science pages, has published a story on the electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS), with a lengthy title: “Nocebo effect explains why some people get symptoms from electromagnetic fields or wind power: in … Continue reading
Recently, I came across two short videos recorded in 2016 in Stockholm. The occasion was the seminar at the SSI concerning health effects of EMF. In these videos, Emilie van Deventer, Head of the WHO EMF Project and Eric van … Continue reading
