Overwhelming power of ICNIRP opinions through backing from GSMA, MWF & telecoms: WHO and governmental agencies, like ARPANSA, BfS, TNO, STUK et al., meekly follow and disseminate misinformation on 5G millimeter-waves’ safety research

Gallery

This gallery contains 1 photo.

In 2020, ICNIRP has published an updated safety guidelines for EMF exposures that consider solely thermal effects of radiation exposure as the source of any health effects. In ICNIRP’s opinion, prevention of thermal effects, by the currently used safety limits, … Continue reading

ARPANSA’s unfounded claims on 5G safety – Nature Publisher should be embarrassed and retract!

Gallery

This gallery contains 1 photo.

…This blog is first, about something funny, but then comes something not funny at all. Bear with me till the end… Few days ago two review articles on 5G millimeter-waves were published by scientists from Australia. The articles in question … Continue reading

This is Big News from USA: Yet another expert considers RF as probably carcinogenic

Gallery

I have written, on several occasions, about the differences between ICNIRP opinions and opinions of ICNIRP members when placed in non-ICNIRP scientific committees. There is something wrong with ICNIRP, that operates in detachment from science in general and thrives thanks … Continue reading

EHS: California Appellate Court holds that Wi-Fi sickness is a disability

Gallery

This gallery contains 1 photo.

…updated on February 26, 2021… The case of EHS (Wi-Fi sickness) in California is of importance and of interest to a broader readership. It is a very good news for all EHS persons but… will be seen what will happen … Continue reading

Another take on relationships of journalist and scientist

Gallery

The post below I have written in 2011, just after I returned from the IARC 2011 classification of RF as possible carcinogen (2B). Now, dealing with hidden censorship I remembered this post and… after reading I still consider it valid, … Continue reading