5G technology and health & environment = FLYING BLIND
On February 6, 2019, took place hearing before the US Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee, on the future of the 5G wireless technology.
U.S. Senator, Richard Blumenthal (D-CT), was concerned with with the lack of any scientific research and data on the potential health effects of the 5G-emitted radiation.
In response to questions from Senator Blumenthal, representatives of the telecom industry confirmed:
- Mr. Gillen (?): there is no ongoing research into health effects of the 5G
- Mr. Gillen (?): industry did not commit any funds to support research into 5G health risks
- Mr. Steve Berry, President and CEO, Competitive Carriers Association: industry relies solely on the low-power assumption to justify safety of the 5G
Mr. Gillen was not listed on the official witness list… that looked as follows:
- The Honorable Meredith Atwell Baker, President and CEO, CTIA
- Mr. Steve Berry, President and CEO, Competitive Carriers Association
- Mr. Shailen Bhatt, President and CEO, Intelligent Transportation Society of America
- Mr. Michael Wessel, Commissioner, U.S.-China Economic & Security Review Commission
- Ms. Kim Zentz, Chief Executive Officer, Urbanova
As Senator Blumenthal put it, we are flying blind.
See the exchange here:
This is déjà vu all-over again.
The scientific justification of the “flying blind” I have presented last year in Australia. My lecture showing what we know, or rather what we should know but we do not know, about the 5G-emitted radiation and health was presented in May 2018 at the ARPANSA in Australia, and including the déjà vu opinion is available here: Leszczynski 5G lecture at ARPANSA
… and the déjà vu is presented here:
BRHP - Between a Rock and a Hard Place 
Pingback: La 5G ou l’intrusion des cartels industriels dans la vie privée. – Deep Green Resistance France
Pingback: Technologie 5G : fuir ou combattre? – Maison du 21e siècle – Le Magazine de la Maison Saine
Flying Blind. I just can’t understand this. How can this be? How can this be scientifically and ethically sound? They don’t believe in the practical application of science because if they did, it would include the effect on life. Their “science” is a sham.
Here is a link exposing the source of FAKE NEWS relied upon by Doctor Trent Nichols: https://www.emfacts.com/2018/08/firefighters-suffer-neurological-damage-after-contact-with-5g-cell-towers/
Mr. Brad Gillen = Executive Vice President, CTIA
https://www.ctia.org/about-ctia/the-ctia-team/brad-gillen
There are no 5G sites on or near fire stations in San Francisco to be alarmed about! This concern was initiated by a fake news story created by anti-wireless campaigners.
Doctor Trent needs to work on his research skills.
The San Francisco California experiences with 5G Relay Stations Near Fire Companies with complaints of TBI and the counties restrictions on placing them near them should alarm any community about this technology!
Trent