Clear indication that ICNIRP review of science is skewed and should be independently validated

In this blog, published from 2009, first on website of STUK – Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority and subsequently transferred to the current site, I have criticized ICNIRP on many occasions. In my recently published blogs I have pointed out … Continue reading →

Two EU politicians criticize ICNIRP – will their report overcome the telecom lobby?

Two politicians, members of the European Parliament, Klaus Buchner (@Dr_KlausBuchner) and Michele Rivasi (@MicheleRivasi) have published a report that critically analyzes the expertise and the independence of the ICNIRP – International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection: ‘The International Commission on … Continue reading →

Industry-paid and undisclosed experts nestled in top-echelons of science

This gallery contains 1 photo.

British ‘The Guardian’ revealed in 2006 that, yet again, famous and presumed trustworthy scientist was not so “trustworthy”…  Sir Richard Doll, famous epidemiologist who demonstrated causal link between tobacco and lung cancer, was a consultant for the chemical industry as … Continue reading →

Telecom in USA: A “YUGE” Conflict of Interest Problem

This gallery contains 5 photos.

Three cases of telecoms Conflict of Interest (CoI): case Berkeley, case FCC and case ICES –  the CoI were possibly disclosed but does it mean that CoI were nullified and avoided? Americans are very conscious about the potential Conflict of … Continue reading →

Did CELLRAID do ‘volkswagen’ to the telecom industry?

This gallery contains 1 photo.

updated Jan. 25, 2016 – this blog in French Did a small Finnish company, CELLRAID, Ltd, do ‘volkswagen’ to the telecom industry by showing lack of compliance? In this story, for the first time, are shown measurements results indicating that … Continue reading →

Is telecom industry so desperate that it calls for a desperate measures?

In my previous blog I criticized ‘Letter to the Editor’ published in Bioelectromagnetics journal. In it the authors bluntly attacked the IARC Working Group experts for their incompetence. Significantly, one of the co-authors of this ‘Letter to the Editor’ is … Continue reading →