Overwhelming power of ICNIRP opinions through backing from GSMA, MWF & telecoms: WHO and governmental agencies, like ARPANSA, BfS, TNO, STUK et al., meekly follow and disseminate misinformation on 5G millimeter-waves’ safety research

This gallery contains 1 photo.

In 2020, ICNIRP has published an updated safety guidelines for EMF exposures that consider solely thermal effects of radiation exposure as the source of any health effects. In ICNIRP’s opinion, prevention of thermal effects, by the currently used safety limits, … Continue reading →

Clear indication that ICNIRP review of science is skewed and should be independently validated

In this blog, published from 2009, first on website of STUK – Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority and subsequently transferred to the current site, I have criticized ICNIRP on many occasions. In my recently published blogs I have pointed out … Continue reading →

Possible ‘censorship’ and certainly ‘cherry-picking’ of science in ‘Helsingin sanomat’, the major Finnish newspaper

This gallery contains 1 photo.

Helsingin sanomat is the major daily newspaper in Finland. Helsingin sanomat does not publish, as if by default, stories, opinions and science questioning the health safety of the radiation emitted by the wireless communication devices and their networks. For Helsingin … Continue reading →

Debating 5G in Helsinki

This gallery contains 1 photo.

Topic of the wireless radiation and health, including the forthcoming deployment of the 5G, is not really debated in Finland. News media shy of this topic because of the controversial science that is often presented in a controversial way by … Continue reading →

STUK trivializes, misinforms and lacks expertise

The website of STUK (Säteilyturvakeskus) in Finland states: “The mission of the Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority (STUK) is to ensure radiation safety in Finland.” To do so, organization needs qualified experts. When experts are lacking, organization might provide misinformation … Continue reading →

EHS research is scientifically worthless for two reasons…

This gallery contains 1 photo.

On October 14th, 2017, Finnish newspaper ‘Helsingin sanomat’, in its science pages, has published a story on the electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS), with a lengthy title: “Nocebo effect explains why some people get symptoms from electromagnetic fields or wind power: in … Continue reading →

Guest blog from Olli Tammilehto: Mitä säteilyturvakeskus turvaa?

Text below was written by Olli Tammilehto. It is intersting question – how STUK can express any opinions of bio-medical matters (health effects) when it completely lacks expertise in this area? Any health-related info from STUK is sham because STUK … Continue reading →