Presentations from the ‘Expert Forum’ held in Jerusalem, Israel

Gallery

This gallery contains 1 photo.

The Israeli Institute for Advanced Studies (IIAS) and Environmental Health Trust (EHT) have organized an ‘Expert Forum on Wireless Radiation and Health’, Jerusalem, Israel, Jan. 23 – 26, 2017. Conference was organized by Charles (Chuck) Greenblatt and Devra Davis. Videos … Continue reading

Report from the BioEM2016

Gallery

This gallery contains 1 photo.

The 23-pages Report from the BioEM2016 is available (BIOEM2016_Report _DL_Final). From the Introduction and Contents: BioEM2016 conference took place on June 6 -10, 2016 in Ghent, Belgium. Seen here is the view of the conference site, Het Pand, the large … Continue reading

Could there be a connection: RF-EMF and Alzheimer’s?

Gallery

This gallery contains 2 photos.

Just published study by Kumar et al. “Amyloid-β peptide protects against microbial infection in mouse and worm models of Alzheimer’s disease.” in the Science Translational Medicine proposes a new explanation for the Alzheimer’s disease. The authors suggest that the disease … Continue reading

Carcinogenicity of Cell Phone Radiation: 2B or not 2B…

Gallery

This gallery contains 1 photo.

… this post is open for comments … In May/June 2011, 30 experts (I was one of them) invited by the WHO International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), gathered in Lyon to discuss the scientific studies on radio-frequency electromagnetic … Continue reading

Expert Roundtable: Skeptical About Cell Phones and Health?

Gallery

The Expert Roundtable event took place on December 9, 2013 at the Commonwealth Club of California in San Francisco. I was listed as one of the participants. However, because I was not able to participate in person, my participation was … Continue reading

• “Nothing New Under the Sky” – the new WHO Research Agenda

Gallery

  WHO has released  2010 Research Agenda for Radiofrequency Fields (http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2010/9789241599948_eng.pdf). It is new but, to my great disappointment, there is nothing new. The opinion, as expected is very much influenced by the ICNIRP. Out of the 19 experts who … Continue reading