Guest blog from Olli Tammilehto: Mitä säteilyturvakeskus turvaa?

Gallery

Text below was written by Olli Tammilehto. It is intersting question – how STUK can express any opinions of bio-medical matters (health effects) when it completely lacks expertise in this area? Any health-related info from STUK is sham because STUK … Continue reading

Scientific misconduct and misinformation on the website of Säteilyturvakeskus (STUK) in Finland

Gallery

Research misconduct, according to the US NIH, includes (emphasis added by DL): Fabrication: Making up data or results and recording or reporting them Falsification: Manipulating research materials, equipment, or processes, or changing or omitting data or results such that the … Continue reading

Säteilyturvakeskus (STUK) in Finland: Amateurish radiation protection

Gallery

In the past, on several occasions, I wrote about the amateurish conduct of STUK experts, those responsible for protecting Finns from the dangers of radiation, any radiation. Links to these posts are here: STUK in Finland: How trustworthy is information … Continue reading

STUK in Finland: How trustworthy is information on smart phones and… nuclear power plants…

Gallery

This gallery contains 3 photos.

Finland’s STUK is hiding important radiation exposure information from the general public, the Government and the Parliament. What else is being hidden by the arbitrary decisions of STUK staff? How comprehensive and trustworthy is the information we, the general public, … Continue reading

STUK and Finland, where only a single opinion is permitted…

Gallery

This post was updated on May 15, 2014… European Union is in an economic crisis. In Finland, the official (=government) opinion is that the one and the only way to survive is to remain in EU and retain common currency. … Continue reading