Leszczynski: Summary of the forthcoming Opening Lecture at the EMF Symposium in Mainz, Germany

Wireless Communication Technology and Health: From 1G to 5G and beyond What we know. What we do not know. What we should know. Dariusz Leszczynski, PhD, DSc Retired; Adjunct Professor, University of Helsinki, Finland; Chief Editor, Radiation and Health of … Continue reading →

Podcast on ‘5G and health’ on Australia’s triple j Hack by ABC radio

The short, 10 minutes (!?), podcast on 5G and health is out. Listen and let me know what do you think about this program? Comments, please! https://www.abc.net.au/triplej/programs/hack/hack/11122050 5G topic at ca. 20:00 of the podcast Presented comments and opinions are … Continue reading →

5G radiation safety is solely an assumption of safety, propagated by engineers

This gallery contains 2 photos.

On April 11, 2019, Editorial Team at the International Electrotechnical Commission has published a blog post: “New IEC Technical Report helps stakeholders evaluate human exposure to 5G base stations”. This report is to provide assurances of quality and safety of … Continue reading →

STUK trivializes, misinforms and lacks expertise

The website of STUK (Säteilyturvakeskus) in Finland states: “The mission of the Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority (STUK) is to ensure radiation safety in Finland.” To do so, organization needs qualified experts. When experts are lacking, organization might provide misinformation … Continue reading →

Journalists Miriam Fisher and Emma Beswick conveyed important 5G opinions in their news-stories

This gallery contains 1 photo.

For the last 17+ years I have been talking to journalists, a lot. At some times I was frustrated that my opinions were not conveyed in their exactness. Hence, I started to write this BRHP blog, to make sure that … Continue reading →

Franz Adlkofer: How the Mobile Communication Industry Deals with Science

This is a re-publication of a recent opinion published on the Pandora Foundation for Independent Research website by Franz Adlkofer. Using as an example the NTP study, Adlkofer comments on the ICNIRP’s approach to science. It is an interesting read. … Continue reading →

Popular Science or… Populist Science?

This gallery contains 1 photo.

On Dec. 19, 2017, the ‘Popular Science’, in its Health section, published a story “Cell phones aren’t a public health risk, no matter what California says. This “possible carcinogen” isn’t going to give you cancer”. Reading this story written by … Continue reading →