Guest Blog from Dr. Don Maisch, Australia: ‘Are community concerns over the 5G network rollout based on unfounded anxiety or valid evidence?’

Below is the next in a series of Guest Blogs on BRHP. The opinions expressed in this Guest Blog are of Don Maisch himself. Publication of these opinions in BRHP does not imply that BRHP automatically agrees with or endorses these … Continue reading →

Leszczynski slides from the Reykjavik presentation on Feb. 24, 2017

This gallery contains 1 photo.

Here are slides of my presentation in Reykjavik, Iceland: leszczynski-reykjavik-lecture-feb-2017

Chips and stickers “protecting” cell phone user are scam!

Some people are concerned about the health effects of radiation emitted by cell phones. Current scientific knowledge is still uncertain and controversial. This is “just suitable” situation for scammers. People looking for protection, and naïve enough, may invest in stickers … Continue reading →

Leszczynski’s blog post on The Conversation UK

…posted on The Conversation UK on Aug. 8, 2016 at 2.57pm BST… reached 10.000+ readers on Aug. 10, 2016 at 8.40am… Today, August 8, 2016, I published my first (hopefully not the last) opinion on The Conversation, UK site. I … Continue reading →

Professor Simon Chapman responds…

Updated May 10, 2016 at 12:10 (see at the end of post) Recent epidemiological study from Australia, on cell phones and brain cancer, made headline news: Chapman S, Azizi L, Luo Q, Sitas F. Has the incidence of brain cancer risen … Continue reading →

Conclusions of the Canadian report confirm that EHS research, and its review, are polluted by the bad science

Recent publication of the Canadian report on Safety Code 6 (RF-EMF and health) brought again to limelight the problem of electromagnetic hypersensitivity – EHS. Yet again, scientists and lay audiences were fed with the standard mantra in the Canadian report: … Continue reading →

Confusing ‘possible carcinogenicity’ and ‘certain toxicity’ of cell phone radiation, coffee, DDT…

This gallery contains 1 photo.

Proponents and opponents of wireless communication fail to distinguish between carcinogenic and toxic effects of possible (IARC 2B category) carcinogens. ******************** In May 2011 International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classified cell phone radiation as a possible human carcinogen. … Continue reading →