Is ‘junk journalism’ complaining about ‘junk science’ in The Baltimore Sun?

Gallery

This gallery contains 4 photos.

this post is open for comments The most efficient way to mislead an inexperienced reader is to write a story with a pinch of truth, a pinch of ambiguity and a dose of falsehoods or misrepresentations. This is the way … Continue reading

BioEM2016: The “new avenues” in epidemiology (part 3/3)

Gallery

This gallery contains 3 photos.

The last plenary session of the BioEM2016 was dedicated to epidemiology with the title inviting to debate “New avenues of epidemiological research – added value or old challenges, or both?“. The set of invited speakers was also impressive, with Mireille … Continue reading

BioEM2016: The NTP study (part 2/3)

Gallery

This gallery contains 2 photos.

The most anticipated event of the BioEM2016 was the last moment addition of the presentation of the US NIEHS National Toxicology Program study on effects of cell phone radiation in rats and mice. The 8AM Wednesday plenary session was provocatively … Continue reading

Epidemiology: ICNIRP hijacked WHO EMF Project

Gallery

This gallery contains 1 photo.

…this post is open for comments… Epidemiological evidence is considered as the most important evidence when evaluating possibility of health effects induced by radiation emitted by wireless communication devices (RF-EMF). I disagree with this notion because of the intrinsic limitations … Continue reading

MMF, NHS UK, and Cancer Research UK are living in a ‘twilight zone’

Gallery

updated on May 16th, 2014 at 17:00 It is amazing that educated people, for some unknown to me reasons, show complete disrespect for the general audiences and talk to them simply nonsense. Recent French epidemiological study CERENAT has found that … Continue reading