Leszczynski slides from the Reykjavik presentation on Feb. 24, 2017

This gallery contains 1 photo.

Here are slides of my presentation in Reykjavik, Iceland: leszczynski-reykjavik-lecture-feb-2017

Telecom in USA: A “YUGE” Conflict of Interest Problem

This gallery contains 5 photos.

Three cases of telecoms Conflict of Interest (CoI): case Berkeley, case FCC and case ICES –  the CoI were possibly disclosed but does it mean that CoI were nullified and avoided? Americans are very conscious about the potential Conflict of … Continue reading →

BioEM2016: meeting friends and listening to science (part 1/3)

This gallery contains 2 photos.

BioEM2016 conference begun on Monday, June 6, in Ghent, Belgium. Seen above is the view of the conference site, Het Pand – the large building on the left on the Leie river, former monastery, is the site of BioEM2016. A … Continue reading →

Leszczynski: Statements for Hearing on Canadian Safety Code 6

The oral statement followed by the written statement from Dariusz Leszczynski for the Canadian Parliament’s hearing on Safety Code 6. **************** Oral Statement of Dariusz Leszczynski, PhD, DSc for the meeting of the Standing Committee on Health of the House … Continue reading →

CHALLENGE for Dr. van Deventer of the WHO EMF Project

… this post is open for comments … WHO EMF Project is preparing Environmental Health Criteria for the radio-frequency electromagnetic radiation (RF-EMF). In several blogs I wrote about the shortcomings of the writing process: WHO Environmental Health Criteria for RF … Continue reading →

Very problematic SCENIHR Report

I just finished reading the 2013 SCENIHR Report and got an overwhelming feeling of the utmost desperation. Evaluation of the scientific evidence is being distorted and SCENIHR provides an aura of “legitimacy” to this distortion. SCENIHR report has over 200 … Continue reading →

Self-contradicting Norwegian report

On Wednesday, September 12, 2012, the Norwegian Institute of Public Health published a report: “Low-level radiofrequency electromagnetic fields – an assesment of health risks and evaluation of regulatory practice” (full report; English summary). The 204-pages long report is written in Norwegian … Continue reading →