Article from the WHO EMF Project – full of bias and oddities creating more questions than giving answers

…this post was updated ,with a notice, on Dec. 22, 2020… WHO EMF Project preparation of the review of the science related to health effects of RF-EMF is severely delayed. It was planned to happen after the publication of the … Continue reading →

BioEM2017 – just a routine, no exciting studies and no breakthrough studies

This gallery contains 1 photo.

BioEM2017 was held in the West Lake Villa near the West Lake scenic area in Hangzhou, China. The city of Hangzhou is one of the Seven Ancient Capitals of China, and shares with Suzhou the ultimate fame of the “Paradise … Continue reading →

BioEM2015: Plenary session on EHS

This gallery contains 3 photos.

One of the plenary sessions at the BioEM2015 in Asilomar presented two views on EHS. Invited speakers were Kjell Hansson Mild and Gunnhild Oftedal. To me the session was a big disappointment. It indicated a stagnation in EHS research and … Continue reading →

BioEM2015: Yet another, absolutely unreliable but peer-reviewed study

There is a serious problem with all to date published epidemiology and human studies because nearly all of them present cell phone radiation exposure as minutes/day of cell phone use. This is a wrong “measure” of radiation exposure and it … Continue reading →

BioEM2015: A potential for exciting debates on controversial issues

This year the annual joint meeting of the Bioelectromagnetics Society (BEMS) and the European Bioelectromagnetics Association (EBEA) – BioEM2015 – will take place on June 14-19 in Asilomar, CA, USA. The program of plenary lectures and workshops was recently published … Continue reading →