My blog: Overwhelming power of ICNIRP opinions through backing from GSMA, MWF & telecoms: WHO and governmental agencies, like ARPANSA, BfS, TNO, STUK et al., meekly follow and disseminate misinformation on 5G millimeter-waves’ safety research …is now available in Spanish: … Continue reading
This gallery contains 1 photo.
In 2020, ICNIRP has published an updated safety guidelines for EMF exposures that consider solely thermal effects of radiation exposure as the source of any health effects. In ICNIRP’s opinion, prevention of thermal effects, by the currently used safety limits, … Continue reading
I have written, on several occasions, about the differences between ICNIRP opinions and opinions of ICNIRP members when placed in non-ICNIRP scientific committees. There is something wrong with ICNIRP, that operates in detachment from science in general and thrives thanks … Continue reading
This gallery contains 2 photos.
The starting point to squash conspiracies and all forms of disinformation is to perform validation of the science review by ICNIRP, GSMA and MWF should consider the potential consequences of potentially incorrect scientific opinions provided by ICNIRP and followed by … Continue reading
In February 2020 US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) published Report analyzing studies examining the possible causal link between RF-EMF and cancer. The anti-5G activists in their reading of the FDA Report have narrowly focused on Report’s dismissal of the … Continue reading
South Korea goes ahead with 5G but… Brussels does not, due to health and radiation levels concerns. The problem is that safety limits for cell towers in Brussels are far more stringent than those recommended by ICNIRP. This causes problems … Continue reading