Where science and big money collide…

Where science and big money collide, we enter a strange “twilight zone” of science politics, where various methods are applied to neutralize “inconvenient” science. One of the examples of such collision between science and big money is presented in, as … Continue reading →

BioEM2015: A potential for exciting debates on controversial issues

This year the annual joint meeting of the Bioelectromagnetics Society (BEMS) and the European Bioelectromagnetics Association (EBEA) – BioEM2015 – will take place on June 14-19 in Asilomar, CA, USA. The program of plenary lectures and workshops was recently published … Continue reading →

Peter Wiedemann responds to my post on the ‘Letter to the Editor’

In one of my previous blogs I criticized recently published in journal Bioelectromagnetics ‘Letter to the Editor’. Later on, the ‘Letter to the Editor’ was also vigorously debated in discussion of BioEM2014 Cape Town group on LinkedIn. My opinion about … Continue reading →

Is telecom industry so desperate that it calls for a desperate measures?

In my previous blog I criticized ‘Letter to the Editor’ published in Bioelectromagnetics journal. In it the authors bluntly attacked the IARC Working Group experts for their incompetence. Significantly, one of the co-authors of this ‘Letter to the Editor’ is … Continue reading →

‘Letter to the Editor’ of the Bioelectromagnetics journal: A travesty of science

Bioelectromagnetics, a peer-review journal of the Bioelectromagnetics Society and the European Bioelectromagnetics Association has just published a ‘Letter to the Editor‘: Wiedemann PM, Boerner FU, Repacholi MH. Do people understand IARC’s 2B categorization of RF fields from cell phones? Bioelectromagnetics. … Continue reading →