This gallery contains 1 photo.
Safety limits on radiation emissions from cell phones, set in late ‘90s by FCC, IEEE and ICNIRP, are insufficient to protect the general public. Read more in The Washington Times Communities column.
UPDATE: it appears that some readers have problems with seeing videos. This problem might be caused by firewall settings in their computers. If you cannot see videos via links provided in this post, try this link of the SUT Science … Continue reading
This year the Science & Wireless 2012 event will discuss “Epidemiology, Assessing Risks, Reviewing Standards“. As stated on the media site of the the local host of the event, Swinburne University of Technology: “Forum on safety of wireless technology Leading … Continue reading
[ * to avoid potential additional confusion - the title of this blog is sarcastic, not what I like to see around] Recent IARC evaluation of mobile phone radiation potential to cause cancer and classification of it as a 2B … Continue reading
As I have written in my previous blog (published yesterday), IARC classification of mobile phone radiation as 2B category carcinogen – possibly carcinogenic to humans – is a big news. So far, WHO evaluation of mobile phone carcinogenicity was based … Continue reading
On January 8th, 2010, the major Finnish newspaper, “Helsingin sanomat“, has published as a “front page” guest editorial (vieraskyna/pääkirjoitus) my text concerning the need for further research on the effects of the mobile phone radiation. The original text (in Finnish) can … Continue reading
updated October 5th, 2009 For many years Europe has led the way in mobile phone research because the funding was available there. In the present situation of scientific uncertainty in this area, research community is hoping that US would get … Continue reading
