• Did INTERPHONE commit …#1 ?

This is the “modified” version of earlier blog. It is published in meantime, while awaiting the response from IARC to my letter (see next blog at  http://betweenrockandhardplace.wordpress.com/2011/07/20/%e2%80%a2did-interphone-commit-2/). **************** INTERPHONE scientists have recently published two separate papers on the same topic: Is … Continue reading →

• IARC evaluation, MMF and safety standards

As I have written in my previous blog (published yesterday), IARC classification of mobile phone radiation as 2B category carcinogen – possibly carcinogenic to humans – is a big news. So far, WHO evaluation of mobile phone carcinogenicity was based … Continue reading →

• IARC classifies the carcinogenicity of mobile phone radiation

  Now it is official. The long awaited IARC evaluation of the carcinogenicity of mobile phone emitted radiation is complete. At the meeting at the IARC headquarters in Lyon, France, Working Group of invited experts has reviewed scientific evidence and, based … Continue reading →

• Washington conference and US Senate hearing on mobile phones and health

updated October 5th, 2009 For many years Europe has led the way in mobile phone research because the funding was available there. In the present situation of scientific uncertainty in this area, research community is hoping that US would get … Continue reading →

• Thermal or Non-Thermal: That is the Question

This blog was posted previously on 8.06.2009 on http://www.stuk.fi/ When in year 2000 I began to attend the bioelectromagnetics scientific meetings I noticed that if someone commented that “the observed effects might be of thermal nature” this was the most … Continue reading →