This gallery contains 1 photo.
Safety limits on radiation emissions from cell phones, set in late ‘90s by FCC, IEEE and ICNIRP, are insufficient to protect the general public. Read more in The Washington Times Communities column.
see also: Leszczynski responds to comments in Repacholi’s guest blog commenting period for this guest blog has ended This is the first guest blog on BRHP. The opinions expressed in it are of Mike Repacholi himself. Publication of these opinions … Continue reading
From time to time I received inquiries about guest blogging. Scientists and non-scientists asked whether I would be interested to post on this BRHP site blogs written by others. I decided that it might be indeed a good idea and, … Continue reading
Melbourne, Australia; Jan. 29, 2013: Reliable scientific data are the Α & Ω of any science. Reliable data are the only way to obtain reliable conclusions. No matter how “fancy” data analysis is performed, if the used scientific data is … Continue reading
UPDATE: it appears that some readers have problems with seeing videos. This problem might be caused by firewall settings in their computers. If you cannot see videos via links provided in this post, try this link of the SUT Science … Continue reading
This year the Science & Wireless 2012 event will discuss “Epidemiology, Assessing Risks, Reviewing Standards“. As stated on the media site of the the local host of the event, Swinburne University of Technology: “Forum on safety of wireless technology Leading … Continue reading
On Wednesday, September 12, 2012, the Norwegian Institute of Public Health published a report: “Low-level radiofrequency electromagnetic fields – an assesment of health risks and evaluation of regulatory practice” (full report; English summary). The 204-pages long report is written in Norwegian … Continue reading
