This gallery contains 1 photo.
Safety limits on radiation emissions from cell phones, set in late ‘90s by FCC, IEEE and ICNIRP, are insufficient to protect the general public. Read more in The Washington Times Communities column.
Melbourne, Australia; Jan. 29, 2013: Reliable scientific data are the Α & Ω of any science. Reliable data are the only way to obtain reliable conclusions. No matter how “fancy” data analysis is performed, if the used scientific data is … Continue reading
On Wednesday, September 12, 2012, the Norwegian Institute of Public Health published a report: “Low-level radiofrequency electromagnetic fields – an assesment of health risks and evaluation of regulatory practice” (full report; English summary). The 204-pages long report is written in Norwegian … Continue reading
This is the “modified” version of earlier blog. It is published in meantime, while awaiting the response from IARC to my letter (see next blog at http://betweenrockandhardplace.wordpress.com/2011/07/20/%e2%80%a2did-interphone-commit-2/). **************** INTERPHONE scientists have recently published two separate papers on the same topic: Is … Continue reading
[ * to avoid potential additional confusion - the title of this blog is sarcastic, not what I like to see around] Recent IARC evaluation of mobile phone radiation potential to cause cancer and classification of it as a 2B … Continue reading
As I have written in my previous blog (published yesterday), IARC classification of mobile phone radiation as 2B category carcinogen – possibly carcinogenic to humans – is a big news. So far, WHO evaluation of mobile phone carcinogenicity was based … Continue reading
Now it is official. The long awaited IARC evaluation of the carcinogenicity of mobile phone emitted radiation is complete. At the meeting at the IARC headquarters in Lyon, France, Working Group of invited experts has reviewed scientific evidence and, based … Continue reading
